20+ Rubyists are using Sinatra – Do you?

by on June 29, 2009

20+ Rubyists are using Sinatra – Do you?

With Sinatra you can quickly create your own tiny web-applications in Ruby and write lots of small services. RubyLearning caught up with some Rubyists working with Sinatra and asked them as to why, how and where they use Sinatra.

Aaron QuintAaron Quint>> I’ve been using Sinatra all over the place. With Vegas I’ve been using it as a way to provide simple web interfaces to existing code. I’ve also been using it to prototype new application ideas. When not using Sinatra, I’ve been using some of the same basic ideas in JavaScript with Sammy.js. In general, Sinatra is just fun to use as it provides the most direct and clean route to get an idea or a piece of code on the web. Read Aaron’s interview on Sinatra.

Adam KeysAdam Keys>> I’m using Sinatra for two things. For personal stuff, I always reach for Sinatra when I want to prototype an idea. It’s easy to get something in place so I can iterate on the idea quickly. Sinatra is great for deploying prototypes too!

At FiveRuns, we use Sinatra as the API endpoint for Dash. We’ve got hundreds of clients in our public beta sending custom metrics to Dash once a minute. Sinatra has handled this load with aplomb. Further, because our API is just a few URL endpoints, Sinatra’s minimal API is a perfect match for our needs. Read Adam’s interview on Sinatra.

Andrew NeilAndrew Neil>> All Sorts searches Twitter every minute for the #collectivenouns hashtag, then parses matching tweets to identify collective nouns. The requirements were very simple – no user log in, no CRUD, only a handful of models and routes – so Sinatra was the perfect choice for this project. I took Nick Plante’s retweet source as a starting point, which proved to be an excellent introduction to Sinatra and DataMapper. Part of the appeal, of course, was to dabble with new technologies. The live site runs on passenger, with Rack::Cache taking care of the caching.

Bruno MirandaBruno Miranda>> I am using Sinatra on a url shortner app that I wrote at s.bopia.com as well as a proxy app that processes beanstalkd queue items for mx.msn.cyloop.com. Sinatra is a great tool to accomplish small tasks as a minimal layer on top of http protocol.

Chris StromChris Strom>> I am using Sinatra most prominently to serve up my family’s cookbook, backed by a CouchDB store. Excruciating details on how I do this are contained in a series of blog posts starting with: http://japhr.blogspot.com/2009/03/my-chain.htm.

I chose Sinatra because it felt close to the metal — especially important because I did not want anything interfering with CouchDB. I continue to use Sinatra because it complements my BDD workflow exceedingly well. Sinatra’s lean DSL encourages me to produce similarly beautiful code. Sinatra never gets in my way. Sinatra goes out of its way to make my life simple.

Corey DonohoeCorey Donohoe>> Sinatra is great for building non-trivial rack middleware. We’re mainly using Sinatra for integration applications between existing pieces of software. Instead of working on a monolithic app we’re writing a fleet of microapps to handle arising business needs. We feel that Sinatra gets in the way less frequently than most other frameworks. With cucumber and good development practices we’re using the same top notch testing tools the Rails guys are using. In my personal hacking I’ve been using it as the basis for twitter microapps leveraging twitter’s oauth API.

Doug SparlingDoug Sparling>> In my former company, we had started using Sinatra for web services and in one instance, a small app used for mobile advertising that doesn’t use the database.

1) Why?We don’t always need the full Rails stack, particularly with web services and anything that doesn’t require the database. It’s also useful for use with legacy databases, which we have to deal with. I can use Datamapper, which is thread safe (though I haven’t seen any performance issues with Rails, which we usually cache anyway).
2) How? – We use Mongrel clusters for our Rails web sites, but with the Sinatra apps we’re using Passenger. For our Sinatra web services, I use Datamapper ORM. I have one internal web service in Rails 2.3.2, but I’m looking at moving it to Sinatra as well.
3) Where? – Mostly internal web services at the moment, but I’m sure we’ll look at it for external services as well.

Jeremy EvansJeremy Evans>> I use Sinatra on quite a few projects, mostly for small applications. At work, we use it to handle the dynamic portion of our mostly static public website, and for some internal applications. Personally, I use it in Giftsmas, my open source gift-tracking application, and in a couple of other sites I maintain.

I use Sinatra because it is simple and flexible. It doesn’t require boilerplate code, and lets you focus on the needs of your application.

Graham AshtonGraham Ashton>> I first tried Sinatra during an in house “hack week” at Wordtracker (one of my main Rails clients). We used Sinatra to great effect to throw up a user interface for a new keyword research tool that we’d come up with during hack week. Sinatra was very accessible – the docs are well written and the mailing list is friendly. I quickly gained a lot of confidence in the framework by reading the code, which is succinct and easy to follow (I wish more projects would follow the advice of the Linux kernel coding style and wrap their code at 80 columns – it encourages legibility).

After that experience Sinatra was an obvious choice for Nesta, my file based CMS. It’s a simple app and Sinatra is a perfect fit for it. I had the application up and running in a matter of days, and I really enjoyed writing it. The goal of Nesta was to build a CMS that people could easily modify to suit their own web sites, and Sinatra makes it very easy for people to do that. There’s not a lot of ceremony.

I still use Rails for larger apps, but I’m now turning to Sinatra first whenever I want to try something out, or if I’m not sure where a new application is going. It’s more fun.

Hasham MalikHasham Malik>> I have recently started development with the Sinatra micro framework while working at CambridgeDocs. Earlier we have used PHP / Ruby on Rails for server-side back ends of native iphone applications that we have been developing. Sinatra lets you create REST based services with minimalistic approach which is ideal of mobile back ends. Sinatra is also lean and fast and at the same time it gives you the liberty to use whichever ORM / templating system you want. Sinatra has this positive vibe among Rubyists these days with 1.0 nearing its release its great time to learn this new framework.

James Edward Gray IIJames Edward Gray II>> At Highgroove Studios, Sinatra is a vital part of the architecture of our monitoring application, Scout. We provide the API the agents use to check-in with data via the micro framework. This is nice because it separates the two functions of the application, allowing us to do things like deploy an application update without interrupting the API service. Still Sinatra gives us a touch more abstraction than something like Rails Metal would and that makes working on the API a little easier.

Jeremy RainesJeremy Raines>> I’m a web developer in Park City, Utah. I got started using Sinatra because I was interested in REST and I like the way Sinatra maps controller actions to HTTP verbs. I also love its lightweight simplicity. It’s great for doing small API based webapps and mashups. Most of my Sinatra apps use Ruby scripts fired by cron jobs to pull data from other webservices into a SQLite database, and serve content with Sinatra. I’ll be using it more in my work with Purple Raincloud, a new social media consultancy here in Utah. I’m @jraines on Twitter, and my homepage is at jeremyraines.com.

Julio Javier CicchelliJulio Javier Cicchelli>> First of all, I like the idea to write about Sinatra and, especially, to show its practical uses to the masses. There are a whole lot of Rails developers but nobody seems to be taking Sinatra quite seriously (at least, this is what I’ve been noticing in websites such as jobs.rubynow.com).

I’ve just founded a company called “Rock & Code” in Amsterdam, The Netherlands that offers solutions developed on Sinatra (instead of Rails or even Merb) to my partners. Why you would ask? Sinatra have definitely broken the MVC paradigm (widely implemented by frameworks such as Rails, Merb, Django, Spring, etc.) and decided to give total control back to the developer by allowing him to build almost any kind of web-based solution (no matter the complexity) in a very simple manner on top of the abstracted HTTP layer it implements from Rack. Furthermore, Sinatra applications can make use of the existing gem library instead of consuming plug-ins specifically-designed for a particular framework. How my company is using Sinatra? I’m currently developing RESTful web services that uses CouchDB and communicates with clients written in both MacRuby and iPhone (in the near future) using JSON but I’ve planned to use Sinatra in web development and also server interfacing. Where can it be applied? I believe that Sinatra suits perfectly for prototyping, client-server applications, SOA applications and interfacing servers, for starters.

Karel MinaríkKarel Minarík>> Sinatra powers my blog, deployment automation, internal apps and is generally the tool of choice whenever I need to build a web app without overhead. Sinatra excels when doing “freestyle coding” — it’s a sort of a blank canvas: you’re bound only by HTTP and your Ruby knowledge. Sinatra doesn’t force anything on you, which can lead to awesome or evil code, in equal measures — and that’s part of its charm to me. Sinatra exposes you to Rack intensely, though, which brings rather different mindset for building web applications then the prevailing “monolithic” style. See eg. www.github.com/rack/rack-contrib for inspiration.

Markus Prinz>> I use Sinatra because it concentrates on one area, and does that very well, leaving the rest up to me. So whenever I have some idea that requires a web app, I can try it out very quickly with Sinatra with a minimum of fuss. And since Sinatra is not a one-size-fits-all solution, but instead essentially a library, I have a great deal of flexibility in using it. That means I can try out new approaches to things like data storage, and use something like Tokyo Cabinet/Tokyo Tyrant or CouchDB instead of a relational database. But I can also use Sinatra as a component in a larger application to offer a web interface, without interfering with the rest of the application.

Matt ToddMatt Todd>> We at @highgroove (Highgroove Studios) use Sinatra in a lot of different projects for memory-efficient web services. One of our products, Scout (@scoutapp) uses it to consume thousands of reports constantly. We are able to fine tune our stack with Sinatra to keep it minimal, responsive, and powerful.

Highgroove Studios is Charles Brian Quinn (@seebq), Derek Haynes (@dhaynes23), Andre Lewis (@alewis), James Edward Gray II (@JEG2), and myself, Matt Todd (@mtodd).

Nick PlanteNick Plante>> We’re using Sinatra for a variety of small web sites and services. Why? Because Sinatra is small, RESTful, fast, and intuitive. It’s perfect for lightweight apps and APIs.

One of our sites, rdoc.info, uses it to generate and host documentation for a variety of Ruby libraries, integrating with GitHub web hooks to automatically regenerate docs whenever projects are updated. We could have used Rails, but the additional overhead, helpers, and other extras that come pre-packaged with it just weren’t necessary. In fact, they would have probably gotten in our way.

Tweetdreams is another small Sinatra-based project that we launched earlier this year. It’s a Twitter dream journal. There really isn’t much to it, which is sort of the beauty of it. The source is available on GitHub as “retweet” and it’s been used as the basis for a number of other Twitter-oriented projects including the http://all-sorts.org linguistic experiment created by Andrew Neil.

I should note that both of these projects use DataMapper and Haml, too. Sinatra is ORM and templating language agnostic, which can be another bonus if you already have a predefined set of tools that you’re familiar with and want to use.

Peter CooperPeter Cooper>> As I don’t work on big projects, I’m using Sinatra for everything now, where I would have used Rails before. It’s nearly all local or private stuff for now but I’d like to be able to release more community projects using it in due course. I love Sinatra because it’s less opinionated and more Ruby-like than Rails. It might take me a little longer to achieve certain results but I can “plug and play” code, libraries, and frameworks wherever I like with it, rather than have to work around tightly coupled “conventions.”

Piyush GuptaPiyush Gupta>> When your application is small, Sinatra helps us to develop applications quickly and easily. Sinatra is easy to understand and follow. We have recently used it for a twitter mashup called MillionTwitter Follower which is not yet live. Expecting it to be live soon.

Sam GoebertSam Goebert>> Bigcurl uses Sinatra to power its HTTPush API, which is a hosted gateway to the Apple Push Notification Service. Our complete api frontend is implemented using Sinatra. This gave us a tremendous boost during development of the API specification. We were able to experiment more as the code has very few lines. Second reason we went with Sinatra was memory consumption, since we span lot of instances over the course of a day this was crucial to get the maximum out of a machine but maintaining the beauty in code.

Sau Sheong ChangSau Sheong Chang>> I picked up Sinatra first when I was writing my search engine and I was looking for a simple way to write my search engine interface. The simplicity of Sinatra blew me away and I was soon knee-deep into writing more apps on Sinatra. After a few more applications, I was convinced that Sinatra is the way to write web applications as it is meant to be. Today I use it to write quick and simple web applications, often in combination with DataMapper, that serve as front-end interfaces for larger systems.

Saurabh PurnayeSaurabh Purnaye>> I work for Synechron, Pune. The applications we create are mostly UI based (html/css/jquery and flex), and I need web services to respond to the calls from UI – that’s where I use Sinatra. Sinatra is really fast and easy for providing RESTful web service solutions. There are many options while working with Sinatra – for example Database: ORM (datamapper/active record), Templating: (erb/haml/builder), http caching, filters, helpers and error handling. One of it’s best features is it comes with Rack middleware. For the last 6 months I am using Sinatra and I feel very happy to work with it.

Do YOU use Sinatra?

Twitter

If you are a Rubyist using Sinatra, we would like to know as to why, how and where you are using Sinatra. Post this as a blog comment. Thanks.

Post supported by 1st Easy Limited: UK based 1st Easy Limited offer Sinatra and Rails hosting running on a Phusion Passenger (mod_rails) and LAMP stack. If you want to get to know them first, or simply want to try out your Sinatra or Rails skills, let them arrange a free trial hosting account for you – full technical support from their team is included!

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by Satish Talim

Follow me on Twitter to communicate and stay connected

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Mukund June 29, 2009 at 12:01 pm

Simplicity may be one reason for Sinatra. But anything beyond the basics fits better into a MVC model.
People seem to write about not requiring the full Rails stack, you can always do a config.frameworks -= [:active_record, :action_mailer] etc. in environment.rb these days to get rid of framework components you don’t need. If you don’t want the Rails overhead for some functions, you can use the metal functionality of Rails 2.3 and rack is present in the middleware now. http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/12/17/introducing-rails-metal
With Merb merging into Rails 3.0, Sinatra will continue to be a niche. YMMV

Reply

Luca Guidi June 29, 2009 at 2:03 pm

I love Sinatra because it’s guided by the “less is more” principle, it provides a bare minimum set of instruments to build up you application. If combined with Rack, it offers an infinite world of possibilities. I think new rubyists should learn Sinatra first, then Rails.

Reply

Chris June 29, 2009 at 4:06 pm

I tried Ruby on Rails a few years back and was impressed; kind’a like a 4G language in terms of creating back end databases and tables; gutted i never continued to learn it.

Reply

M June 29, 2009 at 5:53 pm

Don’t forget about Sequel as an ORM option for your Sinatra-based projects!

It’s admirably maintained by Jeremy Evans, mentioned in the above article, and has proven much more suitable and useful than DataMapper in my own projects.

Reply

Trevor Bramble June 29, 2009 at 11:07 pm

“Most of my Sinatra apps use Ruby scripts fired by cron jobs to pull data from other webservices into a SQLite database, and serve content with Sinatra.”

That’s exactly what I’m doing with http://killthe.net/ !

Reply

Jônatas Paganini February 15, 2010 at 8:39 pm

I love Sinatra too!

Reply

Ekrem Aksoy February 22, 2011 at 1:58 am

Using Sinatra + MongoMapper. It’s damn simple to use as a structured backend..

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 34 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: